Tesla has a community Change its future in its robotaxis. The company is now planning to launch a public vehicle service to the San Francisco Bay area. Tesla calls it by the “ROBOTAXI” service, but legally, the car will have the pilots.
The program seems to put electric carmaker in US water in the US State in the world’s most independent traffic – where Tesla is already placed in misleading language around their driver’s technology.
On Friday, your California government department spokesy, which controlled taxi reservations and government taxi services, said Tsla had not only informed taxi service for workers and “choosing” members of the public. Technology, Tesla is clear to introduce this type of service in California: In March, he obtained a Charter “accommodation Charter” permission to take Tesla workers on the back of the wheel behind the wheel. But Tesla – It is legally allowed to perform a private service there.
“Tesla is not allowed to test or move public (paid or unpaid) to [autonomous vehicle] By driving or outside the driver, “said CPUC Terrie Props wrote in the email.” Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) to[autonomous vehicle]which, already, would have the driver. “
Business Insiderer began that Tesla told workers that planned to launch the robotaxi service to the Bay area at the beginning of Friday.
Earnest Gets for investors, the Deputy President of the Ashok Elluwamy Deputy Ntluswamy said Tesla “works with the government to obtain permission” to implement the Bay place. “At that time, we will introduce the service with the driver’s seat to speed up when we wait for your control,” he said.
According to the Legislative, however, Tessela is currently allowed to introduce any type of service in private vehicles, which means “a person on the driver’s seat” will have to be a driver. Tesla does not have permission to call automated vehicles even at the Security Driver, Private: “So can’t use the driver [autonomous vehicle] in the ministry of passengers. “
Tesla appears to speak outside of both sides of its mouth here. The company seems to emphasize the taxi service that is taxi in California, while raising shareholders and roads used by the taxi service using the “Robotaxis” and is independent. Automaker seems to use the process before. Current management and California State of allegedly Tessela honed consumers by means of “AutoPILOC” to sell technology.
“Teska couldn’t have both ways. Automaker” gives California many characters of a false advertisement by emphasizing that it is a robotaxi when they tell management is not necessarily. “
