Ukrainian Defense Instrument calls Russian Battle Russian Referred that the Way of Western Weapons Is OK

• Warts approach the ears in the wrong way in thinking of serious conflicts, the Ukrainian industrial field said.

• Countries need good good weapons instead of the few beautiful.

• It is a warning that industrial officials, professionals, and other European defense servants have been cleared.

Ukraine Defense Inspiration Promotes the West to leave its long term repairs in Sleek, producing weapons, which are produced, the necessary form to survive and win the warning war against Russia.

Serhiy Goncharov, the National Association Officer of Ukraine Industries – showing businesses around Insains that Syst Siming Systems can be seriously harmful in strong conflict. Those programs are ready to have, but the weight keys.

Weighing conflict

The war in Ukraine indicates that you do not need ultra-directly, expensive weapons, Goncharov told Ubi. You need a great provision of sufficient fireplace.

He said expensive weapons such as US R982 Excalibur Excalibur Excalibur Excalibur Excalibur Excalibur (Each shell costs $ 100,000) when the other side has the marital military plans and the cheaper traditional type.

Goncharov pointed to M107, a self-employed firearm that was held in the US in the 1960’s, as an example of a costly firefighter.

“You do not need 10 streamers from Swedish who may have been one of the best artillery programs,” he said to the Artillery system made of BAE Systems awarded Ukraine in Sweden. Instead, you need 200 cheap 200 howstiitzers such as Bohdana performed by Ukraine.

“A large amount of damage,” a large number of ammo and applition, in the resemblance of this approach requires continuously weapons to continue fighting, especially if no guarantee of the highest weapons will be high-quality weapons.

The war in the Russian

The Russian Representation of Ukraine has been an extended amount of Artillery costs and large characters. The war in other ways put great wars, destroying World War I and World War II, with higher injuries and loss of large equipment.

Russia has one of the world’s largest warfare supported by a large number of people. The world has repeatedly shown a willingness to pursue the style of war that is limited, making many armies and weapons to wear their enemy.

Russian attacks chewing machines. The UK Defense Department said in December that Russia had lost large war tanks and about 8,000 vehicles since the first occurrence in February on February 2022.

Russians weighs to find those things to lose. Ukraine has been fought with a weapon and ammo shortage, as well as deficit. Ukraine turned to small drones, cheaper drones as an asymmetric war; Russia used unwanted systems in the battle again.

China, some of the anxiety in the western, is her same type of power, one with the weight of losing.

On the other hand, on the other hand, we spent the past twenty and converted against low-quality enemies where their armies can defeat high skills.

European and NATO they wake up

Goncharov’s warning has been filled with other Western Defense officials and companies.

Lands who have learned to read the lessons about Russia in the conflict in Ukraine, especially in Europe, where many countries warns Russia continue to pursue quickly.

Gabrielius Landrbergis, Lithuanian Defense Minister of Defense, Natua Ally Brolle Russia, previously described the war with one “high prices.”

He said that when West was focused on new and expensive expensive expenses, Russia has been “forming something cheap, fast.”

He said the West “prepared a different kind of war” than he faced in the opposite of Russia, focused on impressive “expensive.

TROELS LEND POLSEN, Denmark Denmark Denmark Minister in Denmark, earlier he told Ubi

Head Nomo, Mark Rette, urged the countries to take the same vows at the beginning this year, saying that the alliance drank heavily on the development of weapons. He said the alliance works perfectly, “but he does not have to be perfect.”

He said Ukraine would continue with the “seven to seven” machines, while NATO categories persist in reaching “nine or 10.”

He said it was not in relation to finishing costly weapons, but about getting the balance. It’s about “getting the speed and perfect quality done in the right meeting.”

That is that military experts are also bi.

Michael O’hanlon, Second Owner and Director of Research in the foreign policy system at the Brootoings center, means the west it needs to change. American troops, for example, used for wars when “the whole point will not make them covering months and months.”

But he also said that that does not mean that the West needs to completely stop the development of advanced programs. “Those things were not important because we realized that some things are also important,” he said.

The UK priests again warned last month when the war reflected that Westerns needed to change his weapons. Luke Pollard said Ukraine’s war demonstrated Nato “the way we conducted our distances, the way we conducted our defenses, expired.”

He said Nato ‘soldiers’ soldiers and found a large cost of the high kit. And it will take you five years, 10: Five years to challenge purchases, some 10 years of construction. “

The industry is cautious, too.

Kulfillar Värsi, Milrem Robotic Officer Nalaly of Nalaly Estonia, told Ay May that “we need to learn in Ukraine, and we need to get pragmaine in the form of the machine.”

He said Europe needs to learn that “having simple pieces of equipment better than getting 10 most complex pieces of equipment.”

He said the countries needed to start buying billions of thousand pieces of en-masse so that the industry may change. “The industry has to do what the customer shops. And when the customer still buys a few more complicated items, the industry is justified.” And the fact is that it may not work.

Read the first article in Business Insider