UN Top Court says all countries should improve climate change. Here are some important ways.
Hague, Netherlands (AP) – The High Court “of the High Court of the Weather for the Change of Climate, First Their Beginners Start Doing” The Problem There is Rulating All Sorts and Our Health. “
Country Country Country of Correctional Vision of Justice, running more than 500 pages, prompted quickly by activists as a way to change weather law.
After years of lighting the nations fearing that they could disappear from the seawater, the UN distribution asked the court to answer two questions: What countries are obliged to do under the world line to prevent the cause of people? And what are the legal consequences of governments in which their actions, or lack of action, is the most harmful to the weather and the environment?
Here are some key points from the idea sent on Wednesday.
Healthy Planet is a primary human right
In a simple statement that can have deep legal characteristics, the Court said everyone had the right to a protected planet.
“The human right of a clean and healthy environment is a natural environment with delight in other human rights,” said Court President Yuji Wase the hearing during the two hours.
The visual planet is a human right and is part of the country’s cultural law, which means that all countries are obliged to protect, not just weather agreements and other agreements.
To violate international law
Failure to deal with weather changes, the court is a violation of the international law.
That is important because it applies to all countries and opens the way of legal action, including the provinces returning to ICJ to be united. crimes in animals; and investment agreements to agree with international law.
“With today’s official decision, the international Court of League Leagues – As a Society’s Historical Court: Those who suffer from the impact of the restoration,” Joie Chowdhury, high lawyer in the center of international environmental law.
Payment Time?
The court has ruled that other countries or persons owned by climate change do not qualify for compensation.
In the economic economy linked to the issue of greenhouse gastrointest gas issuers can take a rebuilding infrastructure or discharting infrastructure, and restores the natural medals and organisms.
If that does not happen, the financial compensation may be evaluated, even though the judges acknowledged that “it can be difficult, as uncertainty is uncertain of the extent caused by harm caused by harm caused by harm caused by harm caused by harm caused by harm caused.
The activists praise you that part of the decision as a reflection in a history that wants to look at justice.
“The ICJ decision approaches the country where governments cannot be able to appeal to their legal obligations. It confirms that Vishal Prasad,” said the Pacific Islands Director in the fight for climate change.
Weather Refugees
While the court opinion is far from, no one expects to solve problems immediately.
Judges noted that people would be forced to flee their homes to avoid the dangers caused by climate change and surrounding countries not to travel weather conditions when their lives were at stake. If the world disappears under the rising sea level, that country does not stop being there, they say.
In the Nations of Pacific Island, the threat is real. Since 1993, sea levels around the Vanuatu coast have increased in 6 millimeters (.24 inches) (
